David Park sent this along. I haven't really been following basketball statistics lately, but some of you might find it interesting.
Adjusted plus-minus ratings, etc.
Categories:
1 Comment
Leave a comment
Subscribe to Entry
For more info on our research:
Blogroll
Sister Blogs:
Statistics:
- Chance News
- The Endeavour
- Christian Robert
- Revolution Computing
- Yu-Sung Su's Blog
- The Numbers Guy
- Messy Matters
Visualization:
Cognitive and Behavioral Science:
- Decision Science News
- British Psychological Society Research Digest
- Seth Roberts [experimental psychology]
- Criteria's Employee Testing Blog
- The Hardest Science
Social and Political Science:
- Monthly Labor Review Precis
- Marginal Revolution [economics]
- Language Log
- Social Science Statistics
- The Baby Name Wizard
- Vox EU
Machine Learning:
Cultural:
Pages
Research supported by the National Science Foundation
National Institutes of Health
Yahoo Research
Search
Recent Comments
- Ryan J. Parker: Thanks for the link. I'm trying to learn how to read more
Recent Entries
- Bayesian homework solutions
- How to think about how to think about causality
- This is a problem that pretty much takes care of itself
- Statistical computing job in Bristol, England
- AT has a blog
- Perils of analyzing data without context
- Cloud computing
- The Science Blog blog
- "Statisticians reject global cooling": it all depends on the meaning of "decrease," "trend," and "virtually assure"
- Don't comment code
- Bing sucks
- Adjusted plus-minus ratings, etc.
- Comparing freq. and Bayesian model selection
- Come up with a title for our new blog!!
- Variations on the histogram
- The immigrant paradox: foreign-born Latinos have lower rates of psychiatric disorders
- Winston Churchill on statistical modeling
- Scozzafava is a Conservative Republican (by New York State standards)
- Numeracy, frequency, and Bayesian reasoning
- Some practical questions about prior distributions
Categories
- Administrative (15)
- Art (37)
- Bayesian Statistics (256)
- Causal Inference (100)
- Decision Theory (155)
- Economics (226)
- Literature (141)
- Miscellaneous Science (123)
- Miscellaneous Statistics (446)
- Multilevel Modeling (178)
- Political Science (673)
- Public Health (147)
- Sociology (263)
- Sports (29)
- Statistical computing (129)
- Statistical graphics (161)
- Teaching (158)

Thanks for the link. I'm trying to learn how to best apply Bayesian methods to basktball, and I fit a hierarchical model similar to the model in the "basketball statistics" post above (see http://www.basketballgeek.com/2009/09/07/a-basic-hierarchical-model-of-efficiency/).
This kind of model doesn't take into account how basketball actually works at the player level, so I'm pessimistic on the usefulness of this method. I think those checks you suggest would prove worthwhile to help answer this.
By doing that sort of stuff for more recent models I've built really helps to see if the model is actually modeling the underlying process well or not. It's really useful and, as you suggest in your book with Hill, isn't done often enough.