I don't see the humor here, but two different people emailed this to me so I think there's some sort of legal requirement that I blog it. . . .
11 Comments
Leave a comment
Subscribe to Entry
For more info on our research:
Blogroll
Sister Blogs:
Statistics:
- Chance News
- The Endeavour
- Christian Robert
- Revolution Computing
- Yu-Sung Su's Blog
- The Numbers Guy
- Messy Matters
Visualization:
Cognitive and Behavioral Science:
- Decision Science News
- British Psychological Society Research Digest
- Seth Roberts [experimental psychology]
- Criteria's Employee Testing Blog
Social and Political Science:
- Monthly Labor Review Precis
- Marginal Revolution [economics]
- Language Log
- Social Science Statistics
- The Baby Name Wizard
- Vox EU
Machine Learning:
Cultural:
Pages
Research supported by the National Science Foundation
National Institutes of Health
Yahoo Research
Search
Recent Comments
- May: The sad thing is that they will probably end up read more
- Braddy: I recieve something like this every day, I don't see read more
- Bruce Tabor: Well she's clearly not part of his normal distribution of read more
- jrhs: Thank you, J DeLong. I thought maybe I should get read more
- J DeLong: That friggin cracked me up when I read it. I read more
- Jeremy Miles: Compare and contrast with the scatterplot blog response: http://scatter.wordpress.com/2009/02/04/i-think-this-is-my-favorite-stats-joke-ever/ read more
- Matt Stevens: For me, the cartoon was a bit of a shock read more
- ZBicyclist: The moment I read your comment I guessed this was read more
- Brent: Usually the "best" punchline on xkcd comics is in the read more
- sameer: i think more interesting is that on the same day, read more
- TheOneEyedMan: Silly me, I avoided emailing you this because I thought read more
Recent Entries
- More healthy, happy conservatives
- What statistics courses should a methods-interested poli sci Ph.D. student take
- Updated MICE package for multiple imputations
- Race, region, and vote choice in the 2008 election: implications for the future of the Voting Rights Act
- More on the problem with email
- A Quinn Martin production
- Heads I win, tails I don't lose
- OmniGraphSketcher functionality for Windows?
- Hollywood-style lectures? Maybe not.
- Bayesian jobs at SAS
- The divergence of the intellectual upper class
- Inbox zero
- Big juicy datasets
- A horror story involving the correction of a published scientific article
- A question about poker
- Seniors Skeptical on Health Care Spending
- Linf: An L-infinity Classifier
- Election 2008: What really happened
- Baseball stats: innovation, randomness, and other issues
- A cool bit of experimental research on group threat and voter mobilization
Categories
- Administrative (15)
- Art (36)
- Bayesian Statistics (240)
- Causal Inference (93)
- Decision Theory (151)
- Economics (200)
- Literature (135)
- Miscellaneous Science (120)
- Miscellaneous Statistics (424)
- Multilevel Modeling (171)
- Political Science (640)
- Public Health (134)
- Sociology (248)
- Sports (27)
- Statistical computing (123)
- Statistical graphics (153)
- Teaching (151)

Silly me, I avoided emailing you this because I thought you'd think it frivolous.
i think more interesting is that on the same day, two nerd-adored cartoons had statistics-relevant jokes:
http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive/phd020209s.gif
what's the joint probability density function of... whatever those two random variables are?
Usually the "best" punchline on xkcd comics is in the alt text (hover your mouse over the comic at: http://xkcd.com/539/ If people were sending you the direct link to the image they weren't even giving you a chance to read the whole joke.
The moment I read your comment I guessed this was likely to be xkcd.
There are two types of people in the world:
(1) those who pass around links to LOL xkcd comics, and
(2) those who receive these links and go "huh"?
For me, the cartoon was a bit of a shock because it came out the very morning I introduced boxplots in my intro stat course. I mentioned this in class, and showed them the cartoon, and they seemed genuinely amused.
Compare and contrast with the scatterplot blog response: http://scatter.wordpress.com/2009/02/04/i-think-this-is-my-favorite-stats-joke-ever/
That friggin cracked me up when I read it. I love the play on 'significant other' and 'statistical significance.' Come on Gellman, we've read your books, we know you a bit literal, but, in the words of my yard man, 'them shits funny.'
Thank you, J DeLong. I thought maybe I should get a CAT scan of my "old" brain. ^_^
Well she's clearly not part of his normal distribution of casual dates. I suspect a dependent relationship, clearly conditional on some prior interaction...
Sheesh!
I recieve something like this every day, I don't see any humor here too.
The sad thing is that they will probably end up getting married and staying together until they die.