Religious People Aren’t as Scientifically Naive as We Think

Jesse Bering writes:

Researchers have found that, at least when it comes to what goes on in our own heads, there’s not much of a conflict between religion and science. Sure, that bad case of strep throat your kid got right before your scheduled vacation to Barbados was caused by her chewing on a virus-laden pencil she’d borrowed in math class. . . . But that doesn’t mean God’s not trying to tell you something by–what’s the best word here–‘authoring’ these events. . . . this way of thinking as “co-existence reasoning,” where natural, scientific forces are viewed as directly causing a certain event, but supernatural forces are perceived simultaneously as somehow blowing life into this science. Another way to say this is that science and God often co-exist harmoniously in the same mindset, with science acting ‘proximally’ and God acting ‘distally.’ . . .

This looks interesting but I can’t quite figure out what the experimental findings are. I’ll have to try to track down the researcher who did the study.

1 thought on “Religious People Aren’t as Scientifically Naive as We Think

  1. I agree with your statement, and I'd also say that not all "religious people" (of whom I am one) believe that God causes every single minor event. In fact, at that point, the researchers would end up delving into thorny theological and philosophical questions like free will and such. No matter what our opinions on these will be, regression analysis likely will not provide answers that satisfy anyone… :)

Comments are closed.