A colleague points me to these supremely ugly pie-like graphs by Richard Riesenfeld and Geoff Draper. On the other hand, who am I to say they're ugly? I'm sympathetic to the goal of "exposing complex relationships that are not obvious by usual methods of statistical analysis." And it's hard to argue with "Eighty-eight percent said they enjoyed using the software and 71 percent completed all the tasks without errors." I've certainly never performed such an evaluation of my own graphical methods, instead relying, Tufte-like, on my introspective judgment.
Visualizing election polls
Categories:
3 Comments
Leave a comment
Subscribe to Entry
For more info on our research:
Blogroll
Sister Blogs:
Statistics:
- Chance News
- The Endeavour
- Christian Robert
- Andrew C. Thomas
- Revolution Computing
- Yu-Sung Su's Blog
- The Numbers Guy
- Messy Matters
Visualization:
Cognitive and Behavioral Science:
- Decision Science News
- British Psychological Society Research Digest
- Seth Roberts [experimental psychology]
- Criteria's Employee Testing Blog
- The Hardest Science
Social and Political Science:
- Monthly Labor Review Precis
- Marginal Revolution [economics]
- Language Log
- Social Science Statistics
- The Baby Name Wizard
- Vox EU
Machine Learning:
Cultural:
Pages
Research supported by the National Science Foundation
National Institutes of Health
Yahoo Research
Search
Recent Comments
Recent Entries
- Earth science / statistics postdoc in LA
- I've updated my list of presentations
- What's wrong with a kernel density?
- Defining ethnicity down
- What does it mean to define context-free clustering rules?
- I'm speaking at the AppliBugs meeting in Paris
- Blogging explosion!
- Update on Gallup's supposed oversampling of Democrats
- Connecting the dots
- Does the Senate Finance Committee version of the health-care bill threaten to cripple evidence-based medicine?
- Some sort of update to ggplot2
- Everybody's a critic
- Is Gallup "upping the sample to black Americans"?
- Type M errors are all over the place
- Postdoc openings here in fall, 2010 !!!
- "Science revolves around the discovery of new cause-effect relationships but the entire statistics literature says almost nothing about how to do this."
- Senators and health care; also a discussion of pretty statistical graphics
- Statfight!
- They call me Dear Abby, or, This might at first seem like a pointless tautological exercise, but actually I think it can lead you forward
- Clearing up some misconceptions about Bayesian statistics
Categories
- Administrative (15)
- Art (38)
- Bayesian Statistics (262)
- Causal Inference (105)
- Decision Theory (160)
- Economics (235)
- Literature (149)
- Miscellaneous Science (126)
- Miscellaneous Statistics (461)
- Multilevel Modeling (181)
- Political Science (689)
- Public Health (149)
- Sociology (274)
- Sports (31)
- Statistical computing (132)
- Statistical graphics (166)
- Teaching (161)

"On the other hand, who am I to say they're ugly?"
Don't sell yourself short. Anyone with even one eye can tell they're ugly. And the javascript that pops up their charts resizes my whole browser, which is ugly behavior even for javascript.
While Tufte relied on his considerable intuition, Cleveland did a bunch of actual studies, and found that ... well, pie graphs stink.
Peter,
Cleveland had some pretty good intuition too!