I graded this week's homeworks (from chapter 12 of ARM). When I write homework problems, I think about what they will be like to do. I don't think about what they will be like to grade. I'll try to write better homework problems in future books.
Things I learned when my T.A. was away for a week
Categories:
7 Comments
Leave a comment
For more info on our research:
Blogroll
Statistics:
Visualization:
Cognitive and Behavioral Science:
- Decision Science News
- British Psychological Society Research Digest
- Seth Roberts [experimental psychology]
Social and Political Science:
- Monthly Labor Review Precis
- Marginal Revolution [economics]
- Language Log
- Social Science Statistics
- The Monkey Cage [political science]
- The Baby Name Wizard
- Comparative Political Economy at Columbia
- Vox EU
Machine Learning:
Cultural:
Pages
Research supported by the National Science Foundation
National Institutes of Health
Yahoo Research
Search
Recent Comments
- Andrew: As E Bogue indicates, the advantage of making the homeworks read more
- E Bogue: Both are important. If the results are difficult and tedious read more
- Jaakko Särelä: I think thinking about what they will be like to read more
- Anonymous: What's the book (ARM) you are referring to? read more
- Sebastian: the guardian saint of TAs (though seemingly not the most read more
- Mike Anderson: Humbling, isn't it? I seldom give myself an "A" when read more
- Corey: This is an intriguing observation. Can you go into more read more
Recent Entries
- Urban Obama
- Default prior distributions for logistic regression coefficients
- Multicolor text in R
- Interesting finding, but don't jump the gun on your interpretations
- Is it something I said?
- What do Americans think of gay rights?
- Influence Without Reason: How Religious Identity and Emotion Shape Catholics' Social Conservatism
- Lessons from the 2008 election
- County-by-county vote swings are more uniform than they used to be
- Is it "weird" for a modern state to have only one language?
- Annals of Spam
- "Can economists be trusted?"
- Persistence of regional economic disparities
- Sophisticated data analysis for get-out-the-vote efforts
- Fiction and reality
- The The BCS sucks: Don't believe me, believe Bill James quoting Hal Stern
- Rationality of voting
- "Real men keep p values to themselves"
- State-by-state vote swings are more uniform than they used to be
- "Braiding": Intellectual history, introductions, and malapropisms
Categories
- Administrative (13)
- Art (26)
- Bayesian Statistics (202)
- Causal Inference (61)
- Decision Theory (128)
- Economics (126)
- Literature (96)
- Miscellaneous Science (86)
- Miscellaneous Statistics (346)
- Multilevel Modeling (152)
- Political Science (497)
- Public Health (104)
- Sociology (202)
- Sports (9)
- Statistical computing (99)
- Statistical graphics (99)
- Teaching (110)


This is an intriguing observation. Can you go into more detail as to what made the present homework set difficult to grade and what you would change if you had the chance?
Humbling, isn't it? I seldom give myself an "A" when grading my assignments.
I've found that preparing a rubric that lists each result desired goes a long ways towards spotting problems that are difficult to grade. Still, the proof is in the pudding, and it's useful to revise problems that don't perform the way you'd like.
the guardian saint of TAs (though seemingly not the most effective saint out there) will bless you - both for doing the grading and for writing easy to grade problems.
That said, working with Bag of Tricks as a TA has always a lot of fun, which is actually more important than quick grading.
What's the book (ARM) you are referring to?
I think thinking about what they will be like to do is indeed much more important than how easy they are to grade.
Grading is just a way to tell the students (and a poor way, for that matter) how they did.
Both are important. If the results are difficult and tedious to grade, it reduces the amount of feedback I give to the students. If the grading is relatively quick, I have time to make comments to help students find the source of their errors or affirm them in their solid performance.
As E Bogue indicates, the advantage of making the homeworks easy to grade is that the grader (i.e., me, in this case) can quickly spot mistakes. Then when the students gets back the graded papers, they can see what they went wrong.
The current hwk asked the students to fit some models and do some comparisons. Basically I'm trying to give them practice fitting and graphing and understanding the results. But how do you know things went wrong? For example, you know this when you graph your fitted model and it isn't anywhere near the data. So this is something that I should've explicitly asked the students to do as part of the homework assignment.