This formula is so, so important. It tells you that when you have two sources of variation, only the larger one matters (unless the variances are very close to each other). It comes up all the time in multilevel modeling.
The most important formula in statistics: sqrt(12^2+5^2)=13
Categories:
6 Comments
Leave a comment
Subscribe to Entry
For more info on our research:
Blogroll
Sister Blogs:
Statistics:
- Chance News
- The Endeavour
- Christian Robert
- Revolution Computing
- Yu-Sung Su's Blog
- The Numbers Guy
- Messy Matters
Visualization:
Cognitive and Behavioral Science:
- Decision Science News
- British Psychological Society Research Digest
- Seth Roberts [experimental psychology]
- Criteria's Employee Testing Blog
Social and Political Science:
- Monthly Labor Review Precis
- Marginal Revolution [economics]
- Language Log
- Social Science Statistics
- The Baby Name Wizard
- Vox EU
Machine Learning:
Cultural:
Pages
Research supported by the National Science Foundation
National Institutes of Health
Yahoo Research
Search
Recent Comments
- shunan: this reminds me of the issue that the pooled variance read more
- Oskar Shapley: This is a really good teaching case. Students DO NOT read more
- ZBicyclist: It's certainly a very important formula. If we leave off read more
- jrhs: simple and important indeed. for two independent sources of variation read more
- Andrew: The Pythagorean Theorem is not due to Pythagoras. Stigler's Law read more
- John: Good point. So is all mathematics a series of footnotes read more
Recent Entries
- More healthy, happy conservatives
- What statistics courses should a methods-interested poli sci Ph.D. student take
- Updated MICE package for multiple imputations
- Race, region, and vote choice in the 2008 election: implications for the future of the Voting Rights Act
- More on the problem with email
- A Quinn Martin production
- Heads I win, tails I don't lose
- OmniGraphSketcher functionality for Windows?
- Hollywood-style lectures? Maybe not.
- Bayesian jobs at SAS
- The divergence of the intellectual upper class
- Inbox zero
- Big juicy datasets
- A horror story involving the correction of a published scientific article
- A question about poker
- Seniors Skeptical on Health Care Spending
- Linf: An L-infinity Classifier
- Election 2008: What really happened
- Baseball stats: innovation, randomness, and other issues
- A cool bit of experimental research on group threat and voter mobilization
Categories
- Administrative (15)
- Art (36)
- Bayesian Statistics (240)
- Causal Inference (93)
- Decision Theory (151)
- Economics (200)
- Literature (135)
- Miscellaneous Science (120)
- Miscellaneous Statistics (424)
- Multilevel Modeling (171)
- Political Science (640)
- Public Health (134)
- Sociology (248)
- Sports (27)
- Statistical computing (123)
- Statistical graphics (153)
- Teaching (151)

Good point.
So is all mathematics a series of footnotes to Pythagoras, as Whitehead said about philosophy and Plato? :-)
The Pythagorean Theorem is not due to Pythagoras. Stigler's Law and all that. Also see Exercise 3.1 of Gelman and Hill.
simple and important indeed. for two independent sources of variation though?
It's certainly a very important formula.
If we leave off the sqrt from your formula, to make it (12^2+5^2)=13, we get to say "the variance of the sum is the sum of the variances", which is just a nice mnemonic thing to say.
A variant of this formula also tells you how to combine multiple estimates. If you have two estimates of a particular fact -- say, two presidential polls -- you combine them basis the inverse of the variances.
This is a really good teaching case.
Students DO NOT get it when issues like this are explained using only algebraic symbols.
Using actual numbers usually helps to bring the point across.
this reminds me of the issue that the pooled variance is determined mainly by the greater sample variance(given the sample sizes don't differ too much), thus a test based on the pooled sample variance might not be proper.
anyway I like this nice simple post.