See here for Jeremy's comments to my comments. I agree with what he writes. The whole discussion reminds me of a comment made to me once by a statistician who generally works with engineers. He said that when he talks with people about statistical procedures, engineers focus on the algorithm being applied to the data, whereas statisticians are always thinking about the psychology of the person doing the analysis.
Engineers think about the method, statisticians think about psychology
Categories:
1 Comment
Leave a comment
Subscribe to Entry
For more info on our research:
Blogroll
Sister Blogs:
Statistics:
- Chance News
- The Endeavour
- Christian Robert
- Revolution Computing
- Yu-Sung Su's Blog
- The Numbers Guy
- Messy Matters
Visualization:
Cognitive and Behavioral Science:
- Decision Science News
- British Psychological Society Research Digest
- Seth Roberts [experimental psychology]
- Criteria's Employee Testing Blog
Social and Political Science:
- Monthly Labor Review Precis
- Marginal Revolution [economics]
- Language Log
- Social Science Statistics
- The Baby Name Wizard
- Vox EU
Machine Learning:
Cultural:
Pages
Research supported by the National Science Foundation
National Institutes of Health
Yahoo Research
Search
Recent Comments
- Jax: In my limited experience (and please correct me with counterexamples read more
Recent Entries
- More healthy, happy conservatives
- What statistics courses should a methods-interested poli sci Ph.D. student take
- Updated MICE package for multiple imputations
- Race, region, and vote choice in the 2008 election: implications for the future of the Voting Rights Act
- More on the problem with email
- A Quinn Martin production
- Heads I win, tails I don't lose
- OmniGraphSketcher functionality for Windows?
- Hollywood-style lectures? Maybe not.
- Bayesian jobs at SAS
- The divergence of the intellectual upper class
- Inbox zero
- Big juicy datasets
- A horror story involving the correction of a published scientific article
- A question about poker
- Seniors Skeptical on Health Care Spending
- Linf: An L-infinity Classifier
- Election 2008: What really happened
- Baseball stats: innovation, randomness, and other issues
- A cool bit of experimental research on group threat and voter mobilization
Categories
- Administrative (15)
- Art (36)
- Bayesian Statistics (240)
- Causal Inference (93)
- Decision Theory (151)
- Economics (200)
- Literature (135)
- Miscellaneous Science (120)
- Miscellaneous Statistics (424)
- Multilevel Modeling (171)
- Political Science (640)
- Public Health (134)
- Sociology (248)
- Sports (27)
- Statistical computing (123)
- Statistical graphics (153)
- Teaching (151)

In my limited experience (and please correct me with counterexamples if I am wrong), this seems to be true of ML folk as well. I know you had an earlier post about how ML grad students seem to be smarter that statisticians, but they seem to apply that intelligence to developing fancy methods, rather than strong substantive explanations.