Seth rants about institutional review boards (IRBs). I have no problem with that; I rant about IRBs all the time. (And when IRBs should be doing something, they don't seem to be around.) But I don't know that Seth is being fair to blame "literature professors" for the problem. I've been on some NIH panels where some pretty ridiculous human subjects concerns were raised. And these were scientists on the panels, not literature professors.
Don't blame the literature professors
Categories:
2 Comments
Leave a comment
Subscribe to Entry
For more info on our research:
Blogroll
Sister Blogs:
Statistics:
- Chance News
- The Endeavour
- Christian Robert
- Revolution Computing
- Yu-Sung Su's Blog
- The Numbers Guy
- Messy Matters
Visualization:
Cognitive and Behavioral Science:
- Decision Science News
- British Psychological Society Research Digest
- Seth Roberts [experimental psychology]
- Criteria's Employee Testing Blog
Social and Political Science:
- Monthly Labor Review Precis
- Marginal Revolution [economics]
- Language Log
- Social Science Statistics
- The Baby Name Wizard
- Vox EU
Machine Learning:
Cultural:
Pages
Research supported by the National Science Foundation
National Institutes of Health
Yahoo Research
Search
Recent Comments
Recent Entries
- The divergence of the intellectual upper class
- Inbox zero
- Big juicy datasets
- A horror story involving the correction of a published scientific article
- A question about poker
- Seniors Skeptical on Health Care Spending
- Linf: An L-infinity Classifier
- Election 2008: What really happened
- Baseball stats: innovation, randomness, and other issues
- A cool bit of experimental research on group threat and voter mobilization
- Why don't I do more explicit modeling of spatial or temporal patterns?
- Computational Legal Studies
- The work-until-its-significant strategy
- News flash: Nascar drivers support Republicans
- Two-stage regression as an approximation to multilevel modeling
- Thinking about rationality of voting, and cooperative systems in general, in terms of the design of intelligent agents
- A Central Limit Theorem Java applet
- Clustered standard errors vs. hierarchical modeling
- OmniGraphSketcher
- What do you need to apply to a Ph.D. program in statistics?
Categories
- Administrative (15)
- Art (36)
- Bayesian Statistics (239)
- Causal Inference (93)
- Decision Theory (149)
- Economics (199)
- Literature (135)
- Miscellaneous Science (120)
- Miscellaneous Statistics (423)
- Multilevel Modeling (171)
- Political Science (636)
- Public Health (133)
- Sociology (247)
- Sports (27)
- Statistical computing (121)
- Statistical graphics (152)
- Teaching (149)

"Rants"? I was being factual, I thought. "Literature professor" was shorthand for "non-experts in the area that they are telling experts what to do".
Seth,
I didn't mean "rant" as a negative thing. Rants can be factual. I've ranted. Regarding "literature professor," I just think that's an easy laugh line, but I fear, based on my experience, that the involvement of non-experts is not the key problem with IRBs.