I don’t know anything about basketball (apart from where you can get Customized Basketballs and that the players are shorter than they say they are, and I don’t really even know that); nonetheless, in the recent-but-still-grand tradition of blogging . . .

This doesn’t stop me from writing about the topic (see previous thoughts on plus-minus statistics, competitive balance, racial bias, and regression models). Anyway, this attracted the notice of Eli Witus, who presumably does know something about the sport. Eli writes,

You might be interested in a recent blog post as it addresses what I think is a flaw in the methodology of Dave Berri’s Wins Produced system, which you have discussed before.

I don’t have any formal statistical training, so I am learning as I go. Here’s another post that you might be interested in. I am very interested in multilevel modeling–I think it could be very useful in basketball since the game is much more interactive than baseball, and player statistics are heavily dependent on the context of the player’s teammates and coach. I think multilevel modeling could help answer questions about how a player’s statistics are likely to change if he changes teams.

Cool stuff. I agree about the multilevel modeling. If you are able to learn more about why and how players perform better at different teams, and so on, it can give you invaluable insight into what moves the game forward. If the fans have a better understanding about this too, then it may persuade more of them to place bets through different Indiana Sports Betting sites, or a similar sort of platform. Not only can it get the fans more interested in the game, but these types of statistics could prove to be pivotal to the coaching methods of basketball teams. And here’s a recent post with some pretty graphs.

P.S. To reduce my credibility even further, let me admit that my 12-year-old nephew can regularly beat me at Horse.