I just reviewed a paper for a statistics journal. My review included the following sentences which maybe I should just put in my .signature file:
The main weakness of the paper is that it does not have any examples. This makes it hard to follow. As an applied statistician, I would like an example for two reasons: (a) I would like to know how to apply the method, and (b) it is much easier for me to evaluate the method if I can see it in an example. I would prefer an example that has relevance for the author of the paper (rather than a reanalysis of a “classic” dataset), but that is just my taste.
Lest you think I’m a grouch, let me add that I liked the paper and recommended acceptance. (Also, I know that I do not always follow my own rules, having analyzed the 8 schools example to death and having even on occasion reanalyzed data from Snedecor and Cochran’s classic book.)
One of the good things about analyses of 'classic' data is that the data is available and so I can try to reproduce the results.
For many papers in plant breeding / statistics, the authors analyze their own pet data without publishing the data, making the results irreproducible.
Publishers please note: I'm more likely to read your journal if you publish the software and data used in the articles.
Kevin W