<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- generator="MovableType/3.34" -->
<rss version="0.92">
  <channel>
    <title>Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science: Fooled by randomness</title>
    <link>http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2006/02/fooled_by_rando.html</link>
    <description>Naseem Taleb's publisher sent me a copy of "Fooled by randomness: the hidden role of chance in life and the markets" to review. It's an important topic, and the book is written in a charming style--I'll try to respond in...</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>Fooled by randomness</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/&quot;&gt;Naseem Taleb&lt;/a&gt;'s publisher sent me a copy of &quot;Fooled by randomness:  the hidden role of chance in life and the markets&quot; to review.  It's an important topic, and the book is written in a charming style--I'll try to respond in kind, with some miscellaneous comments.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2006/02/fooled_by_rando.html</link>
    </item>
        <item>
     <title>Bernard Guerrero</title>
     <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Despise &quot;beyond anything on this planet&quot;?? Isn't this a bit extreme? What about, for example, hit-and-run drivers? I despise them even more.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don't underestimate the damage done by moralizers.  F'rex, I'd chalk the Depression up to them more than anyone else.  Cutting liquidity drastically to teach the markets a &quot;lesson&quot; when they've been too exuberant is a silly notion that our last Fed Chairman managed to get beyond.  A hit&amp;run driver can only cause damage to a relative handful; misguided do-gooders can be massively destructive. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
     <link>http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/000399.html#008290</link>
     </item>
        <item>
     <title>Bernard Guerrero</title>
     <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Taleb describes the overconfidence of many &quot;experts.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW, I haven't read Tetlock's &quot;Expert Political Judgment&quot; yet (gotta finish &quot;The Undercover economist&quot; first), but it looks damned good and appears to cover the same ground in some depth.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
     <link>http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/000399.html#008291</link>
     </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>