On June 20, we had a miniconference on causal inference at the Columbia University Statistics Department. The conference consisted of six talks and lots of discussion. One topic of discussion was the use of propensity scores in causal inference, specifically, discarding data based on propensity scores. Discarding data (e.g., discarding all control units whose propensity scores are outside the range of the propensity scores in the treated group) can reduce or eliminate extrapolation, a potential cause of bias if the treated and control groups have different distributions of background covariates. However, it's sort of unappealing to throw out data, and can sometimes lead to treatment effect estimates for an ill-defined subset of the population. There was discussion on the extent to which modeling can be done using all available data without extrapolation. Other topics of discussion included bounds, intermediate outcomes, and treatment interactions. For more information, click here.
Subscribe to Entry
For more info on our research:
Blogroll
Sister Blogs:
Statistics:
- Chance News
- The Endeavour
- Christian Robert
- Andrew C. Thomas
- Revolution Computing
- Yu-Sung Su's Blog
- The Numbers Guy
- Messy Matters
Visualization:
Cognitive and Behavioral Science:
- Decision Science News
- British Psychological Society Research Digest
- Seth Roberts [experimental psychology]
- Criteria's Employee Testing Blog
- The Hardest Science
Social and Political Science:
- Monthly Labor Review Precis
- Marginal Revolution [economics]
- Language Log
- Social Science Statistics
- The Baby Name Wizard
- Vox EU
Machine Learning:
Cultural:
Pages
Research supported by the National Science Foundation
National Institutes of Health
Yahoo Research
Search
Recent Entries
- Earth science / statistics postdoc in LA
- I've updated my list of presentations
- What's wrong with a kernel density?
- Defining ethnicity down
- What does it mean to define context-free clustering rules?
- I'm speaking at the AppliBugs meeting in Paris
- Blogging explosion!
- Update on Gallup's supposed oversampling of Democrats
- Connecting the dots
- Does the Senate Finance Committee version of the health-care bill threaten to cripple evidence-based medicine?
- Some sort of update to ggplot2
- Everybody's a critic
- Is Gallup "upping the sample to black Americans"?
- Type M errors are all over the place
- Postdoc openings here in fall, 2010 !!!
- "Science revolves around the discovery of new cause-effect relationships but the entire statistics literature says almost nothing about how to do this."
- Senators and health care; also a discussion of pretty statistical graphics
- Statfight!
- They call me Dear Abby, or, This might at first seem like a pointless tautological exercise, but actually I think it can lead you forward
- Clearing up some misconceptions about Bayesian statistics
Categories
- Administrative (15)
- Art (38)
- Bayesian Statistics (262)
- Causal Inference (105)
- Decision Theory (160)
- Economics (235)
- Literature (149)
- Miscellaneous Science (126)
- Miscellaneous Statistics (461)
- Multilevel Modeling (181)
- Political Science (689)
- Public Health (149)
- Sociology (274)
- Sports (31)
- Statistical computing (132)
- Statistical graphics (166)
- Teaching (161)

Leave a comment