On June 20, we had a miniconference on causal inference at the Columbia University Statistics Department. The conference consisted of six talks and lots of discussion. One topic of discussion was the use of propensity scores in causal inference, specifically, discarding data based on propensity scores. Discarding data (e.g., discarding all control units whose propensity scores are outside the range of the propensity scores in the treated group) can reduce or eliminate extrapolation, a potential cause of bias if the treated and control groups have different distributions of background covariates. However, it's sort of unappealing to throw out data, and can sometimes lead to treatment effect estimates for an ill-defined subset of the population. There was discussion on the extent to which modeling can be done using all available data without extrapolation. Other topics of discussion included bounds, intermediate outcomes, and treatment interactions. For more information, click here.
Subscribe to Entry
For more info on our research:
Blogroll
Sister Blogs:
Statistics:
- Chance News
- The Endeavour
- Christian Robert
- Revolution Computing
- Yu-Sung Su's Blog
- The Numbers Guy
- Messy Matters
Visualization:
Cognitive and Behavioral Science:
- Decision Science News
- British Psychological Society Research Digest
- Seth Roberts [experimental psychology]
- Criteria's Employee Testing Blog
Social and Political Science:
- Monthly Labor Review Precis
- Marginal Revolution [economics]
- Language Log
- Social Science Statistics
- The Baby Name Wizard
- Vox EU
Machine Learning:
Cultural:
Pages
Research supported by the National Science Foundation
National Institutes of Health
Yahoo Research
Search
Recent Entries
- The divergence of the intellectual upper class
- Inbox zero
- Big juicy datasets
- A horror story involving the correction of a published scientific article
- A question about poker
- Seniors Skeptical on Health Care Spending
- Linf: An L-infinity Classifier
- Election 2008: What really happened
- Baseball stats: innovation, randomness, and other issues
- A cool bit of experimental research on group threat and voter mobilization
- Why don't I do more explicit modeling of spatial or temporal patterns?
- Computational Legal Studies
- The work-until-its-significant strategy
- News flash: Nascar drivers support Republicans
- Two-stage regression as an approximation to multilevel modeling
- Thinking about rationality of voting, and cooperative systems in general, in terms of the design of intelligent agents
- A Central Limit Theorem Java applet
- Clustered standard errors vs. hierarchical modeling
- OmniGraphSketcher
- What do you need to apply to a Ph.D. program in statistics?
Categories
- Administrative (15)
- Art (36)
- Bayesian Statistics (239)
- Causal Inference (93)
- Decision Theory (149)
- Economics (199)
- Literature (135)
- Miscellaneous Science (120)
- Miscellaneous Statistics (423)
- Multilevel Modeling (171)
- Political Science (636)
- Public Health (133)
- Sociology (247)
- Sports (27)
- Statistical computing (121)
- Statistical graphics (152)
- Teaching (149)

Leave a comment