« We've been eating candy with lead | Main | The fractal nature of scientific revolutions »
May 19, 2005
Beauty, sexiness, and teaching evaluations
Aleks pointed me to this paper by James Felton, John Mitchell, and Michael Stinson (Central Michigan University that finds that students' ratings of professors' teaching quality are highly correlated with their ratings of the "easiness" of the course and the "sexiness" of the professors. (I'd point out that all the tables could (and should) be replaced by graphs, but you know that by know, right?)
This paper reminded me of the work of Daniel Hamermesh (University of Texas), who has written several papers on the rewards of beauty, including one on beauty and teaching evaluations. A couple of years ago, I saw some news blurb on this last paper and I emailed Hamermesh (who I've never met) and asked him for the data for the students in my multilevel modeling class to play with. He very graciously sent me the data, and my students always enjoy analyzing them.
Posted by Andrew at May 19, 2005 12:26 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/59
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Beauty, sexiness, and teaching evaluations:
» Pleasing our students from Pub Sociology
College professors and instructors mostly hate student evaluations. [Read More]
Tracked on May 19, 2005 1:32 PM
Comments
I took a course with Hamermesh at Michigan last year (when he was visiting the econ dept.). Great guy.
Posted by: Tidaps at May 23, 2005 11:51 PM.